![]() |
Editors:
|
RANK PAIR SCORE nr. name points percent ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 14. Ants Olev-Jaan Linnamagi 941 62.24 2 306. Knap-De Miguel 928.9 61.44 3 206. Ascencao-Schweitzer 917 60.65 4 304. Rolf Olsson-Rune Hilding 906.2 59.93 5 201. Manuel Oliveira-Jorge Cruzeiro 894 59.13 6 101. Tiago Canelas-Nuno Matos 868.9 57.47 7 7. Carla Soares-Filipe Goncalves 863.1 57.08 8 8. Joke Kelderman-Rene Ammers 862 57.01 9 106. P.G.Pereira-Nuno Paz 858.6 56.79 10 203. Paula Lima-J.P.Rocha Pinto 850.5 56.25 11 311. Anders Palmgren-CarlRagnarsson 848.5 56.12 12 109. Bjartmarsson-Thorvaldsson 843.5 55.79 13 111. Ria Sallsten-Inger Sallsten 838.9 55.48 14 107. Mike Beyer-H.v.Beek 833.5 55.13 15 105. Kirsi Virtanen-Vesa Leskela 826 54.63 16 202. Schutz-Verhoef 815.4 53.93 17 204. Dan Stratan-Radu Mihai 815 53.90 18 11. Carlos Pimenta-Mario Reis 814.8 53.89 19 211. Jan-Olov Andersson-G.Petersson 813.8 53.82 20 114. Teixeira Lopes-Jose P.Sousa 810.9 53.63 21 113. Sveinkels-Kamerbeek 804 53.18 22 15. Nuno Lacerda-Isabel Lacerda 788.5 52.15 23 315. Gerard Limmen-Jan Tulp 782.2 51.73 24 1. M.Estorson-I.Frances 771.1 51.00 25 210. Miguel Teixeira-Rodrigo Soares 770.8 50.98 26 104. Joao Machado-Jose Macedo 770.2 50.94 27 310. Martins Soares-Jose M.Gouveia 768.2 50.81 28 209. Brian Penton-Vera Frances 763.8 50.52 29 10. H.Robbe-C.E.Brands 761.4 50.36 30 302. Wim Hink-Jan de Winter 761.2 50.34 31 5. Acacio Matias-Angela Matias 760.5 50.30 32 110. Hilding Dmesius-Hilding Pers. 757 50.07 33 9. Pedro Nunes-G.Esmeraldo 755 49.93 34 303. Bergsson-G.Sveinsson 752.5 49.77 35 208. Dag Mangset-Anne Rydning 740.5 48.98 36 115. Bartelemy-Hoes 737 48.74 308. H.Jenny-R.Schouten 737 48.74 38 301. Eiriksson-Thorvaldsson 733.6 48.52 39 313. Mart Maastik-Jaak Strandberg 727.5 48.12 40 6. M.Thunberg-Mart Altmae 725.5 47.98 41 12. Stuart Coggrave-Pamela Coggrav 724.4 47.91 42 3. Godric Dearing-Julia Dearing 723.4 47.84 43 213. Robert Snapper-Ric.Fernandes 723 47.82 44 307. Hege Falster-Asle Lutken 721.2 47.70 45 108. Wil Stoop-H.Sprenkeling 712.6 47.13 46 205. Metselaar-Swinkels 707.8 46.81 47 309. Koetser-Bouscher 691 45.70 48 215. Natercia Grade-IlidioRodrigues 679 44.91 49 214. Virgilio Mota-J.A.Fernandes 678.8 44.89 50 312. Jaime Sousa-Ricardo Sousa 643 42.53 51 212. Henrique Ribeiro-Joaq.Trindade 641.1 42.40 52 207. Valen-Balder 629.5 41.63 53 305. Taru Suppula-Jussi Tamminen 629 41.60 54 13. Nuno Mata-Fernando Ribeiro 626.4 41.43 55 102. Dirk Balder-M.Stoop 624.6 41.31 56 103. Pedro Morgado-Ricardo Luiz 615.6 40.71 57 314. Mihkel Juhkami-Tarmo Lindmaa 610 40.34 58 4. Ritva Launne-Marti Launne 602 39.82 59 112. van der Meulen - P.Linssen 539.5 35.68 60 2. Alda Fernandes-Jose Fernandes 520.1 34.40
|
by Rodrigo Martins Soares
There were a few interesting hands on our first
session of the pairs event. Sitting South I held 7-5 in Spades
and Clubs, a couple of 20 point monsters and an 8 card spade
suit. Unfortunately we didnt manage to make the best of
those great deals. Let me tell you, for instance, of that last
hand it was board 18.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It was our last table and we were playing
against another pair from Madeira. My lead was the ªK.
Dealer took it with the Ace, entered dummy with a diamond and
finessed successfully the King of trumps. After drawing the trumps,
he ruffed his last spade with dummys last heart and played
a club. Miguel (sitting North) won with the Jack and cashed the
King and Queen, that was ruffed in hand . The position was now: Of course we could have beaten it if Miguel had played the ¨J when he was in with the clubs. Declarer could have made more difficult for the defence had he entered dummy with a spade ruff for the trump finesse, but we still could have beaten it if I overtake partners club honour with the ace and play a diamond, allowing my partner to win the second club and play the squeeze breaking second diamond. |
|
On board 10 we were again on the receiving end. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Well this was more of a bidding decision than a exceptional declarer play. After the trumps break 2-2 and the fQ falls, its quite easy to produce 11 tricks. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opponents played a strong club system so 4© could have been almost anything. When East bid 5¨ I thought he was sacrificing and giving his partner a lead direction. When 5© got passed back to me I had to decide if partners pass was or not forcing. It appeared to me that it was so givem the vulnerability. If the diamond bid was real partner must have a very strong hand for he doesnt have many diamonds and knows I make take 4© out to 5¨. If the diamond bid is lead directing then E should be very weak for he is preempting. Anyhow, I decided that even if they did make 5© our matchpoint result wouldnt be that great either (in effect it would have been almost average - 25 out of 54). So there I go with the red card. Wrong! Another 5© doubled to the opponents and another single matchpoint (out of 54) to us. |
|
|
Free day for golf or other activities(*) | |
|
OPEN PAIRS TOURNAMENT |
|
|
|
Typical dinner & Folklore |
|
|
|
|
Free day for golf or other activities(*) | |
|
OPEN PAIRS TOURNAMENT |
|
|
|
Final Results |
|